Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hand to Hand"
From Ludocity
m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
{{comment | {{comment | ||
Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
|comment=And it's up. It seemed to go pretty well at the ICA last week, with the new mechanics - making it rock-paper-scissors certainly streamlines it, and makes it much quicker to explain. | |comment=And it's up. It seemed to go pretty well at the ICA last week, with the new mechanics - making it rock-paper-scissors certainly streamlines it, and makes it much quicker to explain. | ||
− | Players still seem fairly reluctant to wander very far at all from the starting point, though; I guess there's not a lot of incentive, unless you've got a | + | Players still seem fairly reluctant to wander very far at all from the starting point, though; I guess there's not a lot of incentive, unless you've got a high-scoring hand and want to hide out. It might be worth forcing the players to spread out for five minutes and wait for a starting bell, to encourage a bit of careful stalking and random encounter. |
}} | }} |
Revision as of 14:50, 26 February 2009
Posted at 00:22, 16 February 2009Kevan said:
Posted at 14:49, 26 February 2009Kevan said:
And it's up. It seemed to go pretty well at the ICA last week, with the new mechanics - making it rock-paper-scissors certainly streamlines it, and makes it much quicker to explain.
Players still seem fairly reluctant to wander very far at all from the starting point, though; I guess there's not a lot of incentive, unless you've got a high-scoring hand and want to hide out. It might be worth forcing the players to spread out for five minutes and wait for a starting bell, to encourage a bit of careful stalking and random encounter.
This game is currently being reworked to use a rock-paper-scissor combat system (the attack/defend was, I think, needlessly overcomplicating what should be a simple, quick mechanic) - I hope to get a new rule sheet and card set up this week.